<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Program committee task--Speaker terms revisited</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.allenkinsel.com/archive/2010/01/program-committee-task-speaker-terms-revisited/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.allenkinsel.com/archive/2010/01/program-committee-task-speaker-terms-revisited/</link>
	<description>SQL Server, PASS, and other data mishaps</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 22 Jul 2010 13:53:20 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.1</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Allen Kinsel</title>
		<link>http://www.allenkinsel.com/archive/2010/01/program-committee-task-speaker-terms-revisited/comment-page-1/#comment-64</link>
		<dc:creator>Allen Kinsel</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 01 Feb 2010 18:23:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.allenkinsel.com/?p=213#comment-64</guid>
		<description>The intent is definetly to get this in the app side of the process, fact is there are a few places that we need to change to make this work, I figure 80% of the abstracts that are submitted would make good sessions for any usergroup now all PASS needs to do is enable them to be used appropriately (if the presenters agree)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The intent is definetly to get this in the app side of the process, fact is there are a few places that we need to change to make this work, I figure 80% of the abstracts that are submitted would make good sessions for any usergroup now all PASS needs to do is enable them to be used appropriately (if the presenters agree)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jack Corbett</title>
		<link>http://www.allenkinsel.com/archive/2010/01/program-committee-task-speaker-terms-revisited/comment-page-1/#comment-63</link>
		<dc:creator>Jack Corbett</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 01 Feb 2010 13:42:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.allenkinsel.com/?p=213#comment-63</guid>
		<description>I agree with Simon&#039;s comment.  Although I think PASS should definitely hove those options on the Speaker contract.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I agree with Simon's comment.  Although I think PASS should definitely hove those options on the Speaker contract.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Simon Sabin</title>
		<link>http://www.allenkinsel.com/archive/2010/01/program-committee-task-speaker-terms-revisited/comment-page-1/#comment-61</link>
		<dc:creator>Simon Sabin</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 29 Jan 2010 22:57:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.allenkinsel.com/?p=213#comment-61</guid>
		<description>I think it should be an option when people submit sessions, not just those that speak. That way you include the new speakers which are the ones that need to be speaking at usergroups to get practice.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I think it should be an option when people submit sessions, not just those that speak. That way you include the new speakers which are the ones that need to be speaking at usergroups to get practice.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
